However, this great intention is
somewhat nullified when the quality of audiobooks is not the best. Patrons tell us all the time about how they
didn’t like this audiobook or couldn’t get through that audiobook because the
narration was terrible. With a sigh of
disappointment that they could not read yet another title because of
less-than-stellar narration, they too often return audiobooks unfinished. Our collection of these books is meant to
cater to their reading needs, but the poor quality of some of the books
prevents them from actually getting to consume them. This is because the problem of poor quality
goes beyond patrons simply being annoyed by a narrator’s voice—the narration
affects several other appeal factors that can make or break a story. The characterization is affected through the
voices the narrator may, or may not, use for each character, thereby infusing a
bit of personality into the characters and sometimes affecting the reader’s
relationship with them. Pacing and tone
are very much influenced by the narrator’s speed and tone of voice. I listened to part of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo in audiobook format, and what I
thought would be a compelling thriller ended up feeling like a boring,
drawn-out story with too many details.
This was thanks to the narrator’s slow pace in speaking and flat tone of
voice. A book that I had anticipated
loving because of the reviews of other readers became, because of the narrator,
a book I really did not enjoy at all.
eBooks are a similar
animal. They are very much like physical
books in that the reader’s imagination provides his or her own voices for the
characters, and there is no external narrator influencing the story at all for
the reader. The eBook format does come with
its own changes to appeal, though.
Dunneback and Trott (2011) argue that, because readers can change font
size, line spacing, and even colors on eReaders, they “will need to rely
entirely on narrative drive to feel the pace of the story” because “the larger
the text, the less there is to indicate how quickly the story is moving” (p.
328). This can, in turn, influence tone:
“When you see large blocks of texts on the page, this can indicate a
description rich story... Short paragraphs with lots of dialogue can mean
snappy or quick-witted characters. If
the visual cues are not there, will the reader tire of the story more quickly?”
(Dunneback & Trott, 2011, p. 328).
These influences on appeal can make reader’s advisory difficult—what
might read as a fast-paced story to one person could read as a slower, more
leisurely read to another, all because of the adaptability of the screen to the
reader’s preferences. How, then, do we
recommend titles to patrons? Do we base
our recommendations off of the print versions of titles, or do we inform
patrons that reading a book on a Kindle might ultimately change the way the
story comes across to them? There are
many factors to consider with both eBooks and audiobooks when doing reader’s
advisory with them, but I think that having to take these changes to appeal
into consideration will only make us more knowledgeable about the titles and genres
we are recommending.
References
Dunneback, K., & Trott, B. (2011). E-books and
readers' advisory. Reference & User
Services
Quarterly, 50(4),
325-9.
Mediatore, K. (2003). Reading with your ears: Readers'
advisory and audio books. Reference &
User
Services Quarterly, 42(4), 318-23.
My one and only experience with an audio book was terrible! I think it was just personal preferences, but I could not have been more displeased with the narrator, and honestly, that alone ruined the experience for me. Before trying this format out a couple of months ago, I completely took for granted all of the additional factors that go into making an audio book appealing. It is scary to think about how a great story that might be a perfect fit for someone can fall so completely short due to a poor experience with the audio book.
ReplyDeleteI agree about audiobook narrators. That's such an important factor, and it's an extra layer - you want to have a good story AND a good narrator. It's like seeing a movie or a play - not only do you want a good script, but also a good cast (like the original cast of "The Sound of Music" movie vs. the cast of the NBC live version on TV from a couple of years ago!). But when you find a good one, it's wonderful! The Harry Potter books narrated by Jim Dale really showed me what a good audiobook could be.
ReplyDeleteYou are spot-on, with all points. E-books can really distort the experience of reading an intended book. When people start a self culture of changing viewing for purely aesthetic reasons, the original aesthetic, pacing & the overall intent of the author and publisher is lost. Some people see e-readers as a text factory, they forget the little & the big details about basic composition in a book. The printed work is more elegant & more representative of the writing. I have yet to see any scientific research that places an e-book reading experience above the real book; though I have seen the latter. The printed work is beautiful & standard; the digital translations are a supplementary format for access when they are truly needed... Real books rule!
ReplyDeleteAudio-books can be dismal & can be amazing...
Great Post...
At my library, I am in charge of the "buffing machine" (it cleans CDs, DVDs, and Audiobooks). On a weekly basis, I am buffing a lot of audiobooks. As terrible as this is, I had never before thought about how much the quality could ruin the experience. I'm very aware that many patrons can't finish the story due to the poor quality of the CDs. We are a public library, so our supplies are at the mercy of those who check them out, and not everyone cares about the quality and care of the supplies. I would hate to be in the middle of a story and not be able to finish it. We also have Layaways (MP3 players), but we get a lot of complaints about the selection. Not a lot of new titles for the patrons to choose from.
ReplyDelete